We all remember those J6 witch-hunts where information that was constitutionally protected from law enforcement scrutiny was scooped up by Congress and passed along to sketchy prosecutors, right?
The protections that would have protected an individual were no barrier at all to a congressional subpoena. Bannon and Navarro learned this the hard way.
There was a lot of outrage over the Epstein case, in part because of earlier plea deals that tied the justice department’s hands in what could be done with the information known about him at the time. The deal is binding on the DOJ.
But Congress is a whole other branch. While most of us were focussed on other things, Congress was talking to Leon Black. Who’s he? He’s the Epstein Associate who knows what’s in the non-disclosure agreements.
Congress wants to know what’s in them. Leon isn’t talking. That was expected.
They’ve still got a card they can play.
And they’re playing it.
Here’s the post…
Jeffrey Epstein associate and financier Leon Black refused to provide the House Oversight Committee with information about nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) involving Epstein’s victims.
I immediately handed him a subpoena for the NDAs. pic.twitter.com/wGFBqSFJG6
— Rep. James Comer (@RepJamesComer) June 29, 2026
And a better look at the video…
Jeffrey Epstein associate and financier Leon Black refused to provide the House Oversight Committee with information about nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) involving Epstein’s victims.
I immediately handed him a subpoena for the NDAs. pic.twitter.com/wGFBqSFJG6
— Rep. James Comer (@RepJamesComer) June 29, 2026
The NDAs include the names of women.
This could shed light on potential victims.
If so, it might provide lines of investigation into the Epstein abuses that could theoretically bring offenders to justice, people who have been shielded by some of the tools a gazillionaire like Epstein could use to silence and intimidate his victims.
